They buy ten good ones that were never tied to a number. By the time it shows up in the bank, the year is already gone.
of ad spend isn't producing revenue in the accounts we audit
of CEOs and CFOs name failure to deliver promised results among their top three reasons for firing a marketing leader (Gartner)
of B2B marketers say their digital advertising fails to meet expectations (Demandbase / Wakefield)
For companies at $3M+ in revenue.
No launch on a theory. The plan gets proven in-market before it scales.
We audit spend, tracking, positioning, and the handoff between marketing and sales, and show you exactly where the revenue is leaking.
We build the go-to-market plan, vet it against your financials, and build the campaign and attribution layer behind it.
Two weeks of live testing to prove the thesis. Then 90-day sprints, measured against your number and reset at the end of each one.
$17M → $55M, EBITDA doubled, 5.5 months
$31M → $47M ARR
$18M above baseline, on half the budget
$15M above baseline, on the same budget
You weren't wrong to hire them. The model was wrong. An agency is measured on leads or sales, which means the moment those numbers look fine, the engagement looks successful whether or not revenue moved. Nobody in that arrangement is holding the revenue number, so nobody notices when the line between the two breaks. We took the seat instead: we're accountable to what lands in the bank, and part of our fee sits in your outcome.
Because most of them are priced to start immediately. Discovery is unbillable, so it gets compressed into a kickoff call and the plan gets built on assumptions about your buyer that nobody tested. That isn't laziness, it's what the pricing model forces. We spend the first two weeks on assessment and the next four building against your actual P&L, and nothing goes live until two weeks of market testing prove the thesis.
The firms that do all of it in-house are the ones that put a junior on your account, because that's the only way the math works. We execute what we're genuinely best at — Google Ads, SEO, and attribution — and we manage the rest against your number, whether it's our contractors, your employees, or a partner we bring in. You're buying the person who owns the outcome, not a seat count.
The Assessment and Roadmap is $5,000 and takes two weeks. Phase Two — the go-to-market build and campaign launch — is $20,000 over four weeks, followed by two weeks of live testing and then 90-day sprints.
We execute Google Ads, SEO, and attribution in-house. Everything else we manage against your number — our contractors, your employees, or a partner we bring in.
No. We operate between marketing and sales operations and work through the team you already have. Where you have a marketing leader, they keep the seat; we own the revenue number alongside them.
Our CAC projections come back 93% accurate because every dollar is traced to booked revenue by channel and persona. Nothing scales until two weeks of live testing prove the thesis, and each 90-day sprint is measured against your number and reset at the end of it.
The engagement runs in 90-day sprints after the eight-week build, so there is a decision point every quarter rather than a long lock-in. The $5,000 assessment stands on its own — you own the roadmap whether or not you continue.
Companies at $3M+ in revenue with existing spend to audit. Below that, there usually isn't enough in the account for the recovery to fund the work.
"Most agencies sell senior strategy but deliver junior execution. Kyber assigned senior execs and delivered the promises nine other agencies we hired failed to keep."
Brandy HippCFO & President, Ashley Black Companies
"Kyber are veterans who know what crayons to pull from the box to create the desired masterpiece. They are true strategists."
Joseph PanettaLOCC
"I've worked with Kyber since 2018 across three companies, and they have always hit revenue targets. They're the only team I trust for marketing and revenue strategy."
Greg Wave